Author |
Message |
Andrew Reitnauer (Areitnau)
Member Username: Areitnau
Post Number: 1 Registered: 06-2007
| Posted on Friday, June 01, 2007 - 08:20 am: |
|
I have recovered latents from the interior of latex gloves with CA fuming and ardrox, but there is a technique described in the March/April 2007 JFI concerning using wetwop, I saw the author do this technique and it works nicely. |
IDUNIT (Unregistered Guest) Unregistered guest Posted From: 208.45.168.113
| Posted on Saturday, March 24, 2007 - 09:16 pm: |
|
Actually, with the proper procedure there are documented successes of 77% at retriving comparable latens from latex gloves. |
Ernie Hamm
| Posted on Sunday, July 15, 2001 - 08:32 pm: |
|
See the post of Julian Love on 7/9/01 in the Technical Question area. |
Webmaster
| Posted on Sunday, July 15, 2001 - 08:19 pm: |
|
Yes, latent prints have been developed on latex gloves in many cases. Like a plastic bag or latex balloon, it is a nonporous surface on which identifiable latent prints might be present. If your local police have the time/resources to process gloves from your break-in, it would be a matter of chance as to whether or not identifiable latent finger or palm prints would be present... even if they pulled out all stops and treated the case like a murder. Please read the FAQ's here. |
charles locke
| Posted on Sunday, July 15, 2001 - 06:53 pm: |
|
During a break in and substantial loss one of the crtiminals left behind latex gloves used during the burgulary. Can they be useful for identification? |