No prints found Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

Latent Print Examination » General Questions from Non-Fingerprint Experts » No prints found « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Webservant (Member)
Moderator
Username: Member

Post Number: 303
Registered: 03-1997
Posted on Wednesday, June 18, 2008 - 06:23 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

When your friend bagged the flashlight, they may have destroyed their (and any other) fingerprints on that non-porous surface. See the FAQs for more information.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Andrew Reitnauer (Areitnau)
Member
Username: Areitnau

Post Number: 10
Registered: 06-2007
Posted on Tuesday, June 17, 2008 - 02:34 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

It is possible. Although a person knows to have touched an object their fingerprints may not be on the item. A latent print is a very fragile entity, composed primarily of water (98-99%). Any contact with an outside surface may wipe away any prints, textures surfaces are not as condusive to fingerprints, the type of surface, if the person's skin was dry, etc.

I hope that helps!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

william savage (Will1969)
Member
Username: Will1969

Post Number: 1
Registered: 06-2008
Posted on Tuesday, June 17, 2008 - 01:42 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

My friend's house was broken into and the person left behind a flashlight. My friend picked up the flashlight and bagged it. The police report came back and stated that no prints were found. My friend finds this hard to beleive as he touched the flashlight himself. He figured that even if the person responsible for the crime wore gloves that at least his prints would have showed as he handled the item himself. Is this possible?

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Username: Posting Information:
This is a public posting area. Enter your username and password if you have an account. Otherwise, enter your full name as your username and leave the password blank. Your e-mail address is optional.
Password:
E-mail:
Action: