Recent Court Ruling Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

Latent Print Examination » Questions from FP Experts for FP Experts... Processing, Testimony, and Technical Matters » Recent Court Ruling « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jason Molino (Jpm)
Member
Username: Jpm

Post Number: 4
Registered: 05-2010
Posted on Friday, May 14, 2010 - 10:27 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)
I have also searched for specifics but have come up short. I would also like a link to this ruling if anyone has it.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Charles Eakins (Ceakins)
Member
Username: Ceakins

Post Number: 1
Registered: 09-2009
Posted on Thursday, September 10, 2009 - 09:41 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)
I recall a case (can't remember where I read it) in the past several months where a case was dismissed or lost because the examiner couldn't testify as to 'how' he made his identification. Can someone point me to it please.
Thank you

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Username: Posting Information:
This is a public posting area. Enter your username and password if you have an account. Otherwise, enter your full name as your username and leave the password blank. Your e-mail address is optional.
Password:
E-mail:
Action: