data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/945ec/945eccdc5675e75d3cb818213935107fd182f1db" alt="Top of page" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd23b/cd23bb8f0e5e31120d5681598ffaf4960eb4e7fc" alt="Previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8eab/d8eabd09318b812bbd2624c0804340acaad404ca" alt="Next message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8858/c8858cfee8ae6ef2e132d9ee59d7850ce23b5a1a" alt="Link to this message"
Webservant (Member)
Moderator Username: Member
Post Number: 348 Registered: 03-1997
| Posted on Monday, February 09, 2009 - 06:35 pm: |
|
A simple, but incomplete, answer is to use a fiberglass brush, feather duster, wide magnetic wand, or even a large wad of cotton to quickly apply fingerprint dusting powder over a large area. A better answer is that there is no one item that should be used for developing prints over a large area, because determination of the proper development procedure requires that the nature of the surface to be examined/processed will dictate what procedure (item[s]) should be used. For example, it would be potentially destructive to important evidence to use a fiberglass brush, feather duster or similar method to apply fingerprint dusting powder to a large porous surface (such as a large mural on white paper attached to a classroom bulletin board). Other factors, such as the presence of apparent bloody impressions, or information that an item was recovered from a river, can also impact which procedure/sequence should be applied. A good place to see the thousands of potential processing sequences to be considered is the CBDIAI website on latent fingerprint processing techniques.
|