Author |
Message |
Kierra Mitchells (Unregistered Guest)
Unregistered guest Posted From: c-69-251-7-168.hsd1.md.comcast.net
| Posted on Monday, February 26, 2007 - 09:17 pm: |
|
HEY MY NAME IS CIERRA I'M IN THE 6TH GRADE AND I'M DOING A SCIENCE FAIR PROJECT ON WHEN WHAT SURFACES ARE EASIER OR HARDER TO LIFT FINGERPRINT METAL,GLASS OR WOOD WHEN LEFT BY PEANUT BUTTER |
KIERRA MTCHELLS (Unregistered Guest) Unregistered guest Posted From: c-69-251-7-168.hsd1.md.comcast.net
| Posted on Thursday, November 30, 2006 - 03:14 pm: |
|
THANKS ERNIE |
Ernie Hamm (Unregistered Guest) Unregistered guest Posted From: mail3.armorholdings.com
| Posted on Thursday, November 30, 2006 - 08:38 am: |
|
Kierra, Glass is an excellent surface for receiving and recovering (lifting) latent prints, are as a number of smooth non-porous surfaces. Rough and porous surfaces are more difficult, but chemical methods make the development of latent prints on porous items, such as paper, cardboard, etc., relatively easy. Latent prints on most porous surfaces are not 'lifted', but recovered through photographic methods. |
Kierra Mitchells (Unregistered Guest) Unregistered guest Posted From: c-69-251-7-168.hsd1.md.comcast.net
| Posted on Wednesday, November 29, 2006 - 10:19 pm: |
|
IM DOING A SCIENCE FAIR PROJECT AND WAS WONDERING WHICH SURFACES SUCH AS GLASS,WOOD,MICAH AND OTHER ARE EASIER TO LIFT FINGERPRINTS PLEASE REPLY AS SOON AS POSSIBLE THANKS |
|