| Author | Message | ||
     jon doe |
man, u a petty *** ****. If u live in some town with 5 people and trillions of government money they just might even think about fingerprinting some bottles. It costs money everytime the crimelab gets called down to do fingerprints. You have to toe-tag someone before fingerprints get taken, and so what if they did have fingerprints. That doesn't mean a conviction. Im kind of laughing at this. Don't let no one scare you. Your cool | ||
| Michelle |
what equipment do scientists use in the forensic world? | ||
| Messenger |
sorry, dude... youre busted. police tend to process all types of cases. they might not have any prints to compare to but they will keep them on file and if you are ever arrested the prints they take will be compared with those prints of the carton and bottles you touched in that vandalism. bottom line... stay good. **the messenger PS... if you happen to be the owner of the property that was vandalized i would say police have to sometimes make decisions on what types of cases get full attention. in an ideal world they would have been processed. in some situations they may not. | ||
| Chris Obrien |
i was wondering, in what cases would fingerprints be taked from surfaces ... would it just be for important cases such as murder, or would the police try to lift fingerprints off of bottles or cartons left from vandalism??? |
