Author |
Message |
Webmaster
| Posted on Friday, January 19, 2001 - 05:20 pm: |
|
No. Just as men are often, but not always, larger than women... the overall size of their fingerprints (and hands/palms/feet/toes) can be larger. It's about as meaningful as looking at combat boot prints at a military base. The smaller boot prints may belong to average sized women, or men with small feet... or juvenile boys or girls who bought boots at the Army surplus store. --Ed German |
tom froedge
| Posted on Friday, January 19, 2001 - 04:51 pm: |
|
Do male fingerprints have different characteristics from that of a female? |
|