AAFS Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

Latent Print Examination » Questions from FP Experts for FP Experts... Processing, Testimony, and Technical Matters » AAFS « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

EagleEye2 (Unregistered Guest)
Unregistered guest
Posted From: 204.249.77.1
Posted on Monday, February 25, 2008 - 10:13 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

A couple of years ago, I was a trainee affiliate in the Criminalistics section of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS) and decided to upgrade my membership. I applied to be a member in the Criminalistics section as I am a fingerprint examiner and testify in court to the results of my examinations. After review of my application, I was told by AAFS that I should have applied to the General section and would not be considered for membership in the Criminalistics section. I did not understand the decision as DNA examiners in my lab are members of the Criminalistics section and we basically have the same duties, I just work with latent prints instead of DNA. I decided to call AAFS for an explanation. When I called I was given the run-around and when confronted with the DNA/Latent example I explained above, AAFS said they would look into it. I took the whole episode as another "snub" to the science of fingerprints and as a result I withdrew my application. I was just wondering what other fingerprint examiners think and if any fingerprint professionals in the past couple of years have been accepted as members into the AAFS Criminalistics section?

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Username: Posting Information:
This is a public posting area. Enter your username and password if you have an account. Otherwise, enter your full name as your username and leave the password blank. Your e-mail address is optional.
Password:
E-mail:
Action: