Daubert Challenge -
Bin Laden's Terrorist Tried It
After his April 6, 2001 conviction, Ahmed Ressam was known to most of us as just another criminal who failed in his bid to exclude incriminating fingerprint evidence. As Paul Harvey would say, we now know the rest of the story...
Ahmed Ressam was intercepted at the Canadian border in December 1999 with bomb materials and a map targeting Los Angeles International Airport (LAX). His defense team claimed fingerprints on incriminating evidence were not admissible because the science of fingerprints had never been proven reliable. Defense's claim was partially based on sworn testimony in other cases, including testimony by Professor James Starrs, David Stoney, Ph.D., and Simon Cole, Ph.D.
Thank God justice prevailed and Judge Coughenour discounted peculiar claims made by Starrs, Stoney and Cole during their testimony at the US v. Mitchell Daubert Hearing in 1999. Thank God, because Ahmed Ressam was not just another robber or rapist grasping at novel defense strategies to escape conviction. With his damning fingerprints ruled admissible, Ressam entered a plea of guilty to his role in a plot to blow-up Los Angeles International Airport (LAX). He also admitted that he owed his allegiance to Haydar Abu Doha, a London resident close to Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden.
September 11th, 2001 proved how deadly serious the LAX Millennium bomb plot was. Here is what US Customs Agents found in the spare tire well of Ressam's car trunk in December 1999: